\شماره٪٪۱
ATC-40., 1996. Seismic evaluation and retrofit of reinforced concrete
buildings, Applied Technology Council.
\شماره٪٪۲
FEMA-356., 2000. Prestandard and commentary for the seismic rehabilitation
of buildings, Federal Emergency Management Agency Washington,
DC, USA.
\شماره٪٪۳
ASCE/SEI-41-17., 2017. Seismic evaluation and retrofit of existing
buildings, American Society of Civil Engineers.
\شماره٪٪۴
Gupta, B. and Kunnath, S.K., 2000. Adaptive spectra-based pushover
procedure for seismic evaluation of structures. {\it Earthquake Spectra},
{\it 16}(2), pp.367-391.
https://doi.org/10.1193/1.1586117.
\شماره٪٪۵
Chopra, A.K., 2020. {\it Dynamic of Structures}, 5th Edition in SI Units.,
Ed: Pearson Press.
\شماره٪٪۶
Poursha, M., Khoshnoudian, F. and Moghadam, A., 2009. A consecutive
modal pushover procedure for estimating the seismic demands of
tall buildings. {\it Engineering Structures}, {\it
31}(2), pp.591-599.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2008.10.009.
\شماره٪٪۷
Liu, Y. and Kuang, J., 2017. Spectrum-based pushover analysis for
estimating seismic demand of tall buildings. {\it Bulletin of Earthquake
Engineering}, {\it 15}(10), pp.4193-4214.
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10518-017-0132-8.
\شماره٪٪۸
Leelataviwat, S., Saewon, W. and Goel, S.C., 2009. Application of
energy balance concept in seismic evaluation of structures.
{\it Journal of Structural Engineering}, {\it 135}(2), pp.113-121.
https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2009)135:2(113).
\شماره٪٪۹
Akiyama, H., 1985. Earthquake-resistant limit-state design for buildings.
University of Tokyo press.
\شماره٪٪۱۰
Decanini, L.D. and Mollaioli, F., 2001. An energy-based methodology
for the assessment of seismic demand. {\it Soil Dynamics and Earthquake
Engineering}, {\it 21}(2), pp.113-137.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0267-7261(00)00102-0.
\شماره٪٪۱۱
G\"{u}ll\"{u}, A., Y\"{u}ksel, E., Yal\c{c}in, C.,
Anil Dindar,
A.,
\"{O}zkaynak, H.
and B\"{u}y\"{u}k\"{o}zt\"{u}rk, O., 2019.
An improved inpu
energy spectrum verified by the shake table tests. {\it Earthquake
Engineering} \& {\it Structural Dynamics}, {\it 48}(1), pp.27-45.
https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.3121.
\شماره٪٪۱۲
Esmailzadeh-Shahri, R. and Eshghi, S., 2021. Development of an
energy-based method to evaluate the seismic collapse of steel structures.
Presented at the 12th International Congress on Civil Engineering, Ferdowsi
University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran. [In Persian].
\شماره٪٪۱۳
Eshghi, S. and Esmailzadeh-Shahri, R., 2023. Energy-based collapse risk
assessment of steel framed structures subjected to earthquakes. Research
Report No
7423. International Institute of Earthquake Engineering and Seismology (IIEES).
\شماره٪٪۱۴
Esmailzadeh-Shahri, R. and Eshghi, S., 2023. A new energy-based procedure
for seismic collapse assessment of steel moment frame buildings including the
higher mode effects. {\it Presented at the 9th ECCOMAS Thematic Conference on
Computational Methods in Structural Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering
(COMPDYN 2023)}, Athens, Greece, (Accepted).
\شماره٪٪۱۵
Cheng, Y., Lucchini, A. and Mollaioli, F.,
2020. Ground-motion prediction
equations for constant-strength and constant-ductility input energy spectra.
{\it Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering}, {\it 18}, pp.37-55.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-019-00725-x.
\شماره٪٪۱۶
Shargh, G.B. and Barati, R., 2021. Estimation of inelastic seismic input
energy. {\it Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering}, {\it 142}, p.106505.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2020.106505.
\شماره٪٪۱۷
OpenSEES., Open system for earthquake engineering simulation. Pacific
Earthquake Engineering Research (PEER) Center.
\شماره٪٪۱۸
Housner, G.W., 1956. Limit design of structures to resist earthquakes.
{\it In Proceedings
of the First World Conference on Earthquake Engineering}, Berkeley,
California, pp.5.1-5.13.
\شماره٪٪۱۹
Newmark, N.M. and Hall, W.J., 1982. {\it Earthquake Spectra and Design
Earthquake Engineering Research Institute}, Berkeley, Calif.
\شماره٪٪۲۰
Uang, C.M. and Bertero, V.V., 1990. Evaluation of seismic energy in
structures. {\it Earthquake Engineering} \&
{\it Structural Dynamics}, {\it 19}, pp.77-90.
https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.4290190108.
\شماره٪٪۲۱
Lee, S.S. and Goel, S., 2001. Performance-based design of steel moment
frames using target drift and yield mechanism. Report No. UMCEE 01-17, Dept. of
Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Michigan.
\شماره٪٪۲۲
Chopra, A.K. and Chintanapakdee, C., 2004. Inelastic deformation ratios
for design and evaluation of structures: Single-degree-of-freedom bilinear
systems. {\it Journal of Structural Engineering}, {\it 130}, pp.1309-1319.
https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2004)130:9(1309).
\شماره٪٪۲۳
FEMA-440., 2005. Improvement of nonlinear static seismic analysis
procedures. Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC, USA.
\شماره٪٪۲۴
FEMA-355., 2000. State of the art report on systems performance of steel
moment frames subject to earthquake ground shaking. SAC Joint Venture, Federal
Emergency Management Agency Washington, DC, USA.
\شماره٪٪۲۵
Gupta, A. and Krawinkler, H., 1998. {\it Seismic Demands for the Performance
Evaluation of Steel Moment Resisting Frame Structures}. Ed: The John A. Blume
Earthquake Engineering Center, Report No. 132, Stanford University.
\شماره٪٪۲۶
Eshghi, S., and Maddah, M.M., 2019. A study on influencing factors for
simplified seismic collapse risk assessment of steel moment-resisting frames
with intermediate ductility.
{\it International Journal of Structural Integrity},
{\it 11}(6), pp.833-848. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/IJSI-07-2019-0076.
\شماره٪٪۲۷
Lignos, D. and Krawinkler, H., 2008. Sideway collapse of deteriorating
structural system under seismic excitations. PhD Dissertation, Stanford
University.
\شماره٪٪۲۸
NIST-GCR-17-917-46v2., 2017. Guidelines for nonlinear structural analysis
for design of buildings: Part IIa-Steel moment frames. Applied Technology
Council.
\شماره٪٪۲۹
Baker, J.W., Lin, T., Shahi, S.K. and Jayaram, N., 2011. New ground
motion
selection procedures and selected motions for the PEER transportation research
program. Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center Berkeley, CA, PEER
2011/03.
)