Prioritizing the Construction of Bicycle Lanes in the Central Area of Tehran Based on Sustainable Transportation Principles

Document Type : Article

Authors

Department of Civil Engineering, Sharif University of Technology, Tehran, Iran.

Abstract

One of the sustainable solutions to alleviate existing issues caused by personal vehicle usage is the promotion of cycling. The initial step to increase public interest in cycling involves establishing suitable bike lanes. These lanes should not only be safe but also provide a comfortable, attractive environment while ensuring convenient access to public transportation stations and facilitating interaction with other modes of public transit. This research investigates three routes in Tehran's central area, aiming to prioritize them for bicycle lane construction based on safety, attractiveness, and movement potential criteria. Under the safety criterion, important sub-criteria include the slope of the route, permissible speed of vehicles in the lane, traffic volume, the number of intersections, and the location of congestion charge zones. These factors play a pivotal role in creating a secure cycling infrastructure. The attractiveness criterion takes into account sub-criteria such as land use diversity and the incorporation of green spaces along the routes, enhancing the overall cycling experience. Simultaneously, the movement potential criterion evaluates sub-criteria, including the resident population, the availability of public transport stations, and the proximity to educational
centers. This ensures that the selected routes are not only safe and attractive but also practical within the urban context. In this study, the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) is utilized to determine the importance of each parameter. The results indicate that sub-criteria such as the slope of the route, permissible speed of vehicles in the lane, and the number of intersections on the route are more important within the safety criterion. After prioritizing the routes for the
construction of bicycle lanes based on the criteria and sub-criteria in this research, Shoosh Street is identified as having a higher priority compared to other streets. Following Shoosh Street,th 17 Shahrivar Street, and Ferdowsi Street are the next in line for constructing bicycle lanes.

Keywords

Main Subjects


1. Boufous, S., Rome, L. D., Senserrick, T. and Ivers, R., 2011. Cycling crashes in children, adolescents, and adults-a comparative analysis. Traffic Injury Prevention, 12(3), pp. 244–250. DOI: 10.1080/15389588.2011.563333.
2. Sharma, S.K., Upadhyay, R.K., Kumar, V. and Valera, H., 2023. Introduction to sustainable transportation system. In Transportation Energy and Dynamics. Singapore: Springer Nature, pp. 3–6. DOI: 10.1007/978-981-99-2150-8_1.
3. Stroope, J., 2023. Active transportation, context, and community participation: engaged citizens and destination-based walking and biking. LSU doctoral dissertations. 6154.  DOI: 10.31390/gradschool_dissertations.6154.
4. Karolemeas, C., Vassi, A., Tsigdinos, S. and Bakogiannis, E., 2022. Measure the ability of cities to be biked via weighted parameters, using GIS tools. The case study of Zografou in Greece. Transportation Research Procedia, 62, pp. 59–66. DOI: 10.1016/j.trpro.2022.02.008.
5. Ministry of Roads and Urban Development. (2020) Urban Highways and Streets Design Guide, Section 11: Bikeways. [In Persian]
6. Garrard, J., Rose, G. and Lo, S.K., 2008. Promoting transportation cycling for women: the role of bicycle infrastructure. Preventive medicine, 46(1), pp.55-59. DOI: 1016/j.ypmed.2007.07.010.
7. Haworth, N. and Fuller, J., 2018. Providing for bicyclists. In Safe Mobility: Challenges, Methodology and Solutions (pp. 229-253). Emerald Publishing Limited. DOI: 10.1108/S2044-994120180000011012.
8. Kazemeini, A. and Kermanshah, A., 2023. Promoting Sustainable Transport in Developing Countries: A Case Study of University Students in Tehran. Future Transportation, 3(3), pp.858-877. DOI: 10.3390/futuretransp3030048.
9. Ketikidis, K., Papagiannakis, A. and Basbas, S., 2023. Identifying and Modeling the Factors That Affect Bicycle Users’ Satisfaction. Sustainability, 15(18), p.13666. DOI: 10.3390/su151813666.
10. Majumdar, B.B. and Mitra, S., 2017. Valuing factors influencing bicycle route choice using a stated-preference survey. Journal of urban planning and development, 143(3), p.04017001. DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)UP.1943-5444.0000380.
11. Eren, E. and Uz, V.E., 2020. A review on bike-sharing: The factors affecting bike-sharing demand. Sustainable cities and society, 54, p.101882. DOI: 10.1016/j.scs.2019.101882.
12. Zarabadi Pour, S., Yousefi Moghdam, M. and Abdolrazaghi, A., 2021. Investigating the problems and obstacles of cycling in cities (Case Study: Qazvin). Road, 29(108), pp.179-189. [In Persian]. DOI: 10.22034/ROAD.2021.264860.1932.
13. Rybarczyk, G. and Wu, C., 2010. Bicycle facility planning using GIS and multi-criteria decision analysis. Applied Geography, 30(2), pp.282-293. DOI: 10.1016/j.apgeog.2009.08.005.
14. Rezaei, R., Heidari, Y. and Nazari Mehr, A.H. 2014. Evaluation of the criteria of the proposed bike route by using AHP, model Case: Yazd. In The 12th International Conference on Traffic and Transportation Engineering. [In Persian]
15. Saplıoğlu, M. and Aydın, M.M., 2018. Choosing safe and suitable bicycle routes to integrate cycling and public transport systems. Journal of Transport & Health, 10, pp.236-252. DOI: 10.1016/j.jth.2018.05.011.
16. Shirmohammadi, H., Rahimi, F. and Hadadi, F., 2023. Identifying and prioritization effective factors on the selection of bicycle route to improve urban traffic (Case study: district 10 of Tehran city). Journal of Transportation Research, 20(3), pp.359-378. [In Persian]. DOI: 10.22034/tri.2021.260528.2842.
17. Hsu, T.P. and Lin, Y.T., 2011. A model for planning a bicycle network with multi-criteria suitability evaluation using GIS. WIT Transactions on Ecology and the Environment, 148, pp.243-252. DOI: 10.2495/RAV110231.
18. Habibian, M., Hamouni, P. and Haghshenas, P., 2017. Determining the best Path for bicycle lane construction using sustainable transportation approach (case study: District 1 of shiraz). Amirkabir J. Civil Eng, 49(3), pp.593-602. [In Persian]. DOI: 10.22060/CEEJ.2016.683.
19. Izadbakhsh, H., Vazifeh, A., Jahangoshai, M. and Chitsaz, H., 2010. Applied instruction of industrial engineering and management softwares. Jahad Daneshgahi Publications of Amirkabir University. [In Persian]
20. Krenicky, T., Hrebenyk, L. and Chernobrovchenko, V., 2022. Application of concepts of the analytic hierarchy process in decision-making. Management Systems in Production Engineering, 4 (30). DOI: 10.2478/mspe-2022-0039.
21. Momeni, M. 2006. New topics in operations research. Tehran: Management School Publications, p. 360. [In Persian]
22. Nguyen, G. 2014. The analytic hierarchy process: a mathematical model for decision making problems. Senior Independent Study Theses.
23. Saaty, T.L. 2001. Decision making for leaders: The Analytic Hierarchy Process for Decisions in a Complex World. RWS Publications.
24. Salihu, F., Demir, Y.K. and Demir, H.G., 2023. Effect of road slope on driving cycle parameters of urban roads. Transportation research part D: transport and environment, 118, p.103676. DOI: 10.1016/j.trd.2023.103676.
25. Das, S. and Das, S., 2022. An ultra-steep slope two-dimensional strain effect transistor. Nano letters, 22(23), pp.9252-9259. DOI: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.2c02194.
26. Sekiguchi, Y., Tanishita, M. and Sunaga, D., 2022. Characteristics of cyclist crashes using polytomous latent class analysis and bias-reduced logistic regression. Sustainability, 14(9), p.5497. DOI: 10.3390/su14095497.
27. Moomen, M., Rezapour, M. and Ksaibati, K., 2022. An analysis of factors influencing driver action on downgrade crashes using the mixed logit analysis. Journal of Transportation Safety & Security14(12), pp.2111-2136. DOI: 10.1080/19439962.2021.2002991.
28. Mulvaney, C.A., Smith, S., Watson, M.C., Parkin, J., Coupland, C., Miller, P., Kendrick, D. and McClintock, H., 2015. Cycling infrastructure for reducing cycling injuries in cyclists. Cochrane database of systematic reviews, (12). DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD010415.pub2.
29. Tehran Municipality, Transportation and Traffic Deputy. 2016. Iranian National Standardization Organization, Urban Roads-Bicycle Paths. [In Persian]
30. National Association of City Transportation Officials. 2014. Urban Bikeway Design Guide. Island Press.
31. AASHTO. 2012. Guide for development of bicycle facilities. 4th ed. American Association of State Highway Transportation Officials: Washington, DC, USA.
32. MANUAL, H.C., 2010. HCM2010. 5th Edition. Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, DC1207.
33. Putra, S., 2011. The correction value of passenger-car equivalents for motorcycle and its impact to road performance in developing countries. Procedia-social and behavioral sciences, 16, pp.400-408. DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.04.461.
34. Valenzuela, A.L.E.M., dos Santos Lopes, A.A., de Araujo, P.A.B., Della Justina, M.D., Arins, G.C.B. and Rech, C.R., 2022. Geospatial indicators of bikeability index as cyclefriendly city design: A systematic review. Revista Brasileira de Atividade Física & Saúde27, pp.1-12. DOI: 10.12820/rbafs.27e0255.
35. Salarvandian, F., Dijst, M. and Helbich, M., 2017. Impact of traffic zones on mobility behavior in Tehran, Iran. Journal of transport and land use, 10(1), pp.965-982. DOI: 10.5198/jtlu.2017.1087.
36. Aumann, P. and Arnold, T., 2017. Guide to road design part 6A: Paths for walking and cycling(No. AGRD06A-17).
37. Malek hosseini, . Investigating the effective factors in the use of shared bicycles in urban transportation: a case study of Haft Hoz and Madaen neighborhoods in Region 8)’. Quarterly Geography & Urban Planning Journal of Chashmandaz-E-Zagros, 4(11), pp. 159–178. [In Persian]
38. Pucher, J. and Buehler, R. (2006) ‘Why Canadians Cycle More than Americans: A Comparative Analysis of Bicycling Trends and Policies’. Transport Policy, 13(3), pp. 265–279. DOI: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2005.11.001.
39. Jaber, A., Abu Baker, L. and Csonka, B., 2022. The influence of public transportation stops on bike-sharing destination trips: spatial analysis of Budapest City. Future transportation, 2(3). DOI: 10.3390/futuretransp2030038.
40. Rothman, L., Hagel, B., Howard, A., Cloutier, M.S., Macpherson, A., Aguirre, A.N., McCormack, G.R., Fuselli, P., Buliung, R., HubkaRao, T. and Ling, R., 2021. Active school transportation and the built environment across Canadian cities: Findings from the child active transportation safety and the environment (CHASE) study. Preventive medicine, 146, p.106470. DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2021.106470.
41. Voulgaris, C.T., Hosseinzade, R., Pande, A. and Alexander, S.E., 2021. Neighborhood effects of safe routes to school programs on the likelihood of active travel to school. Transportation research record, 2675(8), pp.10-21. DOI: 10.1177/0361198121995490.
42. Baby, S., 2013. AHP modeling for multicriteria decision-making and to optimise strategies for protecting coastal landscape resources. International Journal of Innovation, Management and Technology4(2), pp. 218–227. DOI: 10.7763/IJIMT.2013.V4.395.
43. Melillo, P. and Pecchia, L., 2016, August. What is the appropriate sample size to run analytic hierarchy process in a survey-based research. In Proceedings of the international symposium on the analytic hierarchy process, pp. 4-8. DOI: 10.13033/isahp.y2016.130.
44. United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division. 2019. World Urbanization Prospects 2018: Highlights (ST/ESA/SER.A/421).
45. Mehr News Agency. 2020. Establishment of the first bicycle lane in District 12. Available at: https://shorturl.at/o8NJF. [In Persian]