چارچوبی جهت ایجاد نیمه‌خودکار زمان‌بندی و مدل چهاربُعدی بر مبنای برنامه‌نویسی بصری و BIM

نوع مقاله : پژوهشی

نویسندگان

دانشکده‌ی مهندسی عمران، دانشگاه صنعتی خواجه نصیرالدین طوسی، تهران، ایران.

چکیده

مدل‌سازی اطلاعات ساخت (BIM)، به‌‌عنوان یک فناوری تحول‌آفرین در صنعت ساخت‌وساز شناخته می‌شود. یکی از قابلیت‌های کلیدی BIM، مدل‌سازی چهار‌بعدی است، که زمان‌بندی پروژه را به مدل‌های سه‌بعدی متصل می‌کند. با وجود این، فرآیند زمانبر پیوند دستی اطلاعات زمان‌بندی به مدل‌ها باعث شده است که بسیاری از پروژه‌ها از قابلیت اخیر BIM نتوانند استفاده کنند. پژوهش حاضر، چارچوبی را برای تولید نیمه‌خودکار زمان‌بندی پروژه و مدل‌های چهار‌بعدی با نیاز به کمینه‌ی ورودی از متخصصان ارائه داده است. در چارچوب مذکور، داده‌های متره از مدل BIM برای بهبود دقت و کارایی تخمین زمان استفاده شده‌اند. نوآوری پژوهش حاضر در افزودن منطق ساخت به‌صورت بصری به BIM برای نخستین بار نهفته است، که با استفاده از ابزارهای برنامه‌نویسی بصری، امکان ایجاد زمان‌بندی و شبیه‌سازی چهاربعدی فرآیندهای ساخت را به‌صورت خودکار فراهم می‌‌سازد. یکی از مزایای چارچوب اخیر آن است که هر تغییری در مدل BIM ایجاد شود، زمان‌بندی و تجسم چهار‌بعدی به‌صورت خودکار به‌روزرسانی می‌شوند. روش پیشنهادی در یک مطالعه‌ی موردی پیاده‌سازی شده است، که کارایی و سهولت استفاده از آن را نشان می‌دهد. 

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله [English]

Evaluation of seismic performance of Special truss moment frames (STMF) with Vierendeel special segment

نویسندگان [English]

  • Naimeh Sadeghi
  • Farbod Farmani Rastgoo
Faculty of Civil Engineering, K. N. Toosi University of Technology.
چکیده [English]

In designing structures subjected to seismic forces, selecting an appropriate system based on seismic performance and building height is essential. Special Truss Moment Frames (STMF) are an innovative structural system designed to provide adequate lateral stiffness and control deformations. This system, combining steel trusses and columns instead of traditional beams, is highly efficient in absorbing lateral seismic forces, making it suitable for tall buildings and large spans. This study investigates the influence of the number of stories and the number of Vierendeel special segment panels in the STMF system on its seismic performance parameters. The analyzed models include nine cases with two, five, and eight stories, each designed with one, two, and three special segment panels. These models were developed in the ETABS software for preliminary design, while nonlinear analyses, including pushover and time history, were conducted in OpenSees. The pushover analysis was performed following FEMA P695 guidelines, and the nonlinear dynamic time history analysis was conducted based on ASCE 7 standards with 11 pairs of far-field ground motion records. The results highlight the high ductility of the STMF system, which increases with the number of stories and special segment panels, along with average over-strength factors of 2.5, which are close to the ASCE 7 recommended value of 3. The average transient story drift remained below 2%, while the average residual drift was approximately 0.15%, both within the permissible limits outlined in the code. Moreover, the models exhibit desirable seismic performance without any indications of non-compliance under severe seismic demands. In terms of design, increasing the number of panels in the special segment reduces the amount of structural steel required. This occurs because longer special segments result in lower expected shear forces, leading to smaller cross-sections for members outside the special segment. Conversely, models with shorter special segments demonstrate higher lateral stiffness and greater base shear capacities. Overall, this research confirms that the STMF system with Vierendeel special segments offers excellent seismic performance and can serve as a suitable and cost-effective option for designing structures with large spans.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Special truss moment frame
  • vierendeel
  • pushover
  • time history
  • over-strength factor
  • ductility factor
  • drift

مراجع

1. Dasović, B., Galić, M. and Klanšek, U. 2020. A survey on integration of optimization and project management tools for sustainable construction scheduling. Sustainability, 12(8), pp. 3405. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12083405
2. Aredah, A.S., Baraka, M.A. and Elkhafif, M. 2019. Project scheduling techniques within a building information modeling (BIM) environment: a survey study. IEEE Engineering Management Review, 47(2), pp. 133–143. https://doi.org/10.1109/EMR.2019.2916365
3. Crowther, J. and Ajayi, S.O. 2021. Impacts of 4D BIM on construction project performance. International Journal of Construction Management, 21(7), pp. 724–737. https://doi.org/10.1080/15623599.2019.1580832
4. Boton, C., Kubicki, S. and Halin, G. 2015. 4D/BIM simulation for pre-construction and construction scheduling: multiple levels of development within a single case study. In: Proceedings of the Creative Construction Conference 2015, Kraków, Poland, pp. 500–505. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.1941.3603
5. Bolshakova, V., Guerriero, A. and Halin, G. 2018. Identification of relevant project documents to 4D BIM uses for a synchronous collaborative decision support. In: Proceedings of the Creative Construction Conference 2018, Ljubljana, Slovenia, pp. 1036–1043. https://doi.org/10.3311/CCC2018-134
6. Vass, S. and Gustavsson, T.K. 2017. Challenges when implementing BIM for industry change. Construction Management and Economics, 35(10), pp. 597–610. https://doi.org/10.1080/01446193.2017.1314519
7. Torres-Calderon, W., Chi, Y., Amer, F. and Golparvar-Fard, M. 2019. Automated mining of construction schedules for easy and quick assembly of 4D BIM simulations. In: Computing in Civil Engineering 2019: Visualization, Information Modeling, and Simulation, pp. 432–438. https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784482421.055
8. Sheikhkhoshkar, M., Pour Rahimian, F., Kaveh, M.H., Hosseini, M.R. and Edwards, D.J. 2019. Automated planning of concrete joint layouts with 4D-BIM. Automation in Construction, 107, pp. 102943. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2019.102943
9. Kravchenko, O., Khoruzhy, V., Lyubenko, V. and Nedashkovskyi, I. 2023. BIM technologies in engineering network design. Problems of Water Supply, Sewage, and Hydraulics, 42, pp. 29–34. https://doi.org/10.32347/2524-0021.2023.42.29-34
10. Biswas, H.K., Sim, T.Y. and Lau, S.L. 2024. Impact of building information modelling and advanced technologies in the AEC industry: a contemporary review and future directions. Journal of Building Engineering, 82, pp. 108165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2023.108165
11. Bredella, N. 2019. Simulation and architecture: mapping building information modeling. T.M., 27(4), pp. 419–441. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00048-019-00224-9
12. Borkowski, A.S. 2023. Evolution of BIM: epistemology, genesis and division into periods. Journal of Information Technology in Construction, 28, pp. 646–661. https://doi.org/10.36680/j.itcon.2023.034
13. Rahmani Asl, M., Zarrinmehr, S., Bergin, M. and Yan, W. 2015. BPOpt: a framework for BIM-based performance optimization. Energy and Buildings, 108, pp. 401–412. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2015.09.011
14. Shakeri, E. and Taheri Jebelli, S. 2020. Comparison of project cost estimation with conventional method and dynamic and smart model based on BIM based on list price. Sharif Journal of Civil Engineering, 2(2.1), pp. 141–150. https://doi.org/10.24200/j30.2019.51237.2382
15. Solihin, W., Dimyadi, J., Lee, Y.C., Eastman, C. and Amor, R. 2020. Simplified schema queries for supporting BIM-based rule-checking applications. Automation in Construction, 117, pp. 103248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2020.103248
16. Rasoulimanesh, M., Taghaddos, H., Chokan, F., Dadashi Haji, M. and Tamanaeifar, M.H. 2021. Automated evaluation of fall hazard risk using building information modeling and image processing. Sharif Journal of Civil Engineering, 2(4.1), pp. 39–47. https://doi.org/10.24200/j30.2020.53198.2539
17. Zou, Y., Kiviniemi, A. and Jones, S.W. 2017. A review of risk management through BIM and BIM-related technologies. Safety Science, 97, pp. 88–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2015.12.027
18. Lozano, F., Jurado, J.C., Lozano-Galant, J.A., de la Fuente, A. and Turmo, J. 2023. Integration of BIM and value model for sustainability assessment for application in bridge projects. Automation in Construction, 152, pp. 104935. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2023.104935
19. Cheng, Q., Tayeh, B.A., Abu Aisheh, Y.I., Alaloul, W.S. and Aldahdooh, Z.A. 2024. Leveraging BIM for sustainable construction: benefits, barriers, and best practices. Sustainability, 16(17), pp. 7654. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16177654
20. Oreto, C., Massotti, L., Biancardo, S.A., Veropalumbo, R., Viscione, N. and Russo, F. 2021. BIM-based pavement management tool for scheduling urban road maintenance. Infrastructures, 6(11), pp. 148. https://doi.org/10.3390/infrastructures6110148
21. Nguyen, D.T., Chou, J.S. and Tran, D.H. 2022. Integrating a novel multiple-objective FBI with BIM to determine tradeoff among resources in project scheduling. Knowledge-Based Systems, 235, pp. 107640. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2021.107640
22. Zhang, Q. 2021. Research on the construction schedule and cost optimization of grid structure based on BIM and genetic algorithm. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1744(2), pp. 022065. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1744/2/022065
23. Pour Rahimian, F., Seyedzadeh, S., Oliver, S., Rodriguez, S. and Dawood, N. 2020. On-demand monitoring of construction projects through a game-like hybrid application of BIM and machine learning. Automation in Construction, 110, pp. 103012. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2019.103012
24. Viklund Tallgren, M., Roupé, M. and Johansson, M. 2021. 4D modelling using virtual collaborative planning and scheduling. Journal of Information Technology in Construction, 26, pp. 763–782. https://doi.org/10.36680/j.itcon.2021.042
25. Ciribini, A.L.C., Mastrolembo Ventura, S. and Paneroni, M. 2016. Implementation of an interoperable process to optimize design and construction phases of a residential building: a BIM pilot project. Automation in Construction, 71, pp. 62–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2016.03.005
26. Altun, M. and Akcamete, A. 2019. A method for facilitating 4D modeling by automating task information generation and mapping. In: Advances in Informatics and Computing in Civil and Construction Engineering, pp. 479–486. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-00220-6_57
27. Borrmann, A., König, M., Koch, C. and Beetz, J. 2018. Building information modeling: technology foundations and industry practice. Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-92862-3
28. Kensek, K. 2015. Visual programming for building information modeling: energy and shading analysis case studies. Journal of Green Building, 10(4), pp. 28–43. https://doi.org/10.3992/jgb.10.4.28
29. Ghannad, P., Lee, Y.-C., Dimyadi, J. and Solihin, W. 2019. Automated BIM data validation integrating open-standard schema with visual programming language. Advanced Engineering Informatics, 40, pp. 14–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aei.2019.01.006
30. Collao, J., Lozano-Galant, F., Lozano-Galant, J.A. and Turmo, J. 2021. BIM visual programming tools applications in infrastructure projects: a state-of-the-art review. Applied Sciences, 11(18), pp. 8343. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11188343
31. Chen, Q., Adey, B.T., Haas, C. and Hall, D.M. 2020. Using look-ahead plans to improve material flow processes on construction projects when using BIM and RFID technologies. Construction Innovation, 20(3), pp. 471–508. https://doi.org/10.1108/CI-11-2019-0133
32. Mazars, T. and Francis, A. 2020. Chronographical spatiotemporal dynamic 4D planning. Automation in Construction, 112, pp. 103076. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2020.103076
33. Wang, Z. and Rezazadeh Azar, E. 2019. BIM-based draft schedule generation in reinforced concrete-framed buildings. Construction Innovation, 19(2), pp. 280–294. https://doi.org/10.1108/CI-11-2018-0094
34. Wang, H.W., Lin, J.R. and Zhang, J.P. 2020. Work package-based information modeling for resource-constrained scheduling of construction projects. Automation in Construction, 109, pp. 102958. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2019.102958
35. Sadeghi, N., Dehghani, M.S. and Ingolfsson, A. 2024. Choice of probability distributions for activity durations in project networks with limited sample size. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 150(3), pp. 04024002. https://doi.org/10.1061/JCEMD4.COENG-13753
36. Santiago, J. and Magallon, D. 2009. Critical path method. CEE 320 – VDC Seminar, Stanford University. Available at: https://acqnotes.com/ (Accessed: 4 January 2026).

فایل ها

هم رسانی

ارجاع به این مقاله

آمار