مجله ی مهندسی عمران شریف

مجله ی مهندسی عمران شریف

کنترلر ترکیبی بهینه ی مبتنی بر شتاب زمین برای سازه ی مجهز به میراگرهای مغناطیسی

نوع مقاله : پژوهشی

نویسندگان
دانشکده‌ی مهندسی عمران، دانشگاه تبریز، تبریز، ایران.
10.24200/j30.2025.65523.3381
چکیده
میراگرهای مغناطیسی به‌عنوان یکی از سیستم‌های کنترل نیمه‌فعال با قرارگرفتن در معرض میدان مغناطیسی، رفتار هوشمندی از خود نشان می‌دهند و با تغییر اندازه‌ی میدان مغناطیسی، کنترل سازه انجام می‌شود. جهت پیاده‌سازی سیستم‌های کنترلی اخیر، الگوریتم‌ها و قوانین کنترل مختلفی، مانند قوانین کنترل اسکای‌هوک و گروندهوک ارائه شده است. به‌منظور بهبود قوانین کنترل مذکور، ترکیبی از آن‌ها می‌تواند به دو روش دو حالته و پیوسته استفاده شود. تعیین سهم هر کدام از قوانین کنترل اسکای‌هوک و گروندهوک در قانون کنترل ترکیبی یک چالش است. هدف پژوهش حاضر، استفاده از الگوریتم جستجوی الگو به‌منظور بهینه‌سازی قانون کنترل ترکیبی است. نتایج به‌دست آمده نشان می‌دهند که اگر در محاسبه‌ی تابع هزینه‌، وزن جابجایی از نیرو بیشتر در نظر گرفته شود، سهم بهینه‌ی قانون کنترل اسکای‌هوک در قانون کنترل ترکیبی حدوداً 95% به‌دست می‌آید. همچنین با مقایسه‌ی قانون کنترل ترکیبی دو حالته و پیوسته مشخص می‌شود که کاهش پاسخ‌های جابجایی، سرعت، و شتاب در هر دو روش تقریباً یکسان است، اما نیروی کنترلی موردنیاز در قانون کنترل ترکیبی پیوسته کمتر است.
کلیدواژه‌ها
موضوعات

عنوان مقاله English

The Optimal Hybrid Controller Based on Ground Acceleration for a Structure Equipped with MR Dampers

نویسندگان English

Hosein Ghaffarzadeh
Samira Safikhanlou
Alireza Aran
Faculty of Civil Engineering of Tabriz University, Tabriz, Iran
چکیده English

Magnetorheological (MR) dampers demonstrate intelligent behavior when subjected to a magnetic field, with their structural response controlled by adjusting the magnetic field's intensity. Various control algorithms and laws have been proposed to implement these control systems. Among the fundamental control laws for semi-active systems, the Skyhook and Groundhook control laws are particularly notable. A hybrid approach combining both of them can be employed to enhance the performance of these control laws. However, determining the optimal contribution of each control law—Skyhook and Groundhook—within the hybrid control law presents a significant challenge. In this study, an eight-story structure equipped with MR dampers is analyzed under the excitation of three earthquakes, Bam, Loma-Prieta, and Northridge, to evaluate the effectiveness of the proposed hybrid control law. The objective is to optimize the hybrid control law using the pattern search algorithm. The hybrid control law for structures with MR dampers can be implemented in two ways: on-off and continuous. In the on-off method, the voltage applied to the MR dampers is restricted to two extreme values, whereas the continuous method allows for voltage adjustment across the entire range between these boundaries. Through an analysis of both on-off and continuous hybrid control laws, it is evident that their performance in reducing the structure's displacement, velocity, and acceleration responses is nearly identical. However, the continuous hybrid control law achieves comparable efficiency with significantly lower control forces. As a result, the continuous optimal hybrid control law emerges as a simple yet highly effective solution. Furthermore, by assuming the same weight of force and displacement in the cost function, it is shown that the participation percentage of the Skyhook control law in the hybrid control law is much higher than that of the Groundhook control law. The optimal participation rate of the Skyhook law is obtained to be approximately 0.95.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Semi-active control
MR damper
skyhook
groundhook
pattern search algorithm
 1. Rousta, A.M., 2023. Seismic retrofitting of steel moment-resisting frames (SMRFs) using steel pipe dampers. Structural Engineering and Mechanics, An Int'l Journal, 87(1), pp.69-84. DOI: 10.12989/sem.2023.87.1.069
2. Ghaffari, A.H. and Ghaffarzadeh, H., 2023. Mine blast‐induced ground motion response reduction using semi‐active devices. The Structural Design of Tall and Special Buildings, 32(8-9), p.e2005. DOI: 10.1002/tal.2005
3. Casciati, F., Magonette, G. and Marazzi, F., 2006. Technology of semiactive devices and applications in vibration mitigation. John Wiley & Sons. DOI: 10.1002/0470022914
4. Sohn, H.C., Hong, K.S. and Hedrick, J.K., 2000, September. Semi-active control of the Macpherson suspension system: hardware-in-the-loop simulations. In Proceedings of the 2000. IEEE International Conference on Control Applications. Conference Proceedings (Cat. No. 00CH37162) (pp. 982-987). IEEE. DOI: 10.1109/CCA.2000.897600
5. Khoshnoudian, F. and Mehrparvar, B., 2013. A new control algorithm to protect nonlinear base‐isolated structures against earthquakes. The Structural Design of Tall and Special Buildings, 22(18), pp.1376-1389. DOI: 10.1002/tal.1012
6. Moutinho, C., 2015. Testing a simple control law to reduce broadband frequency harmonic vibrations using semi-active tuned mass dampers. Smart Materials and Structures, 24(5), p.055007. DOI: 10.1088/0964-1726/24/5/055007
7. Ghaffarzadeh, H., Aran, A. and Javadi Amoodizaj, F., 2024. Phase motion predictive control for a structure equipped with MR dampers. Journal of Structural and Construction Engineering. DOI: 10.22065/jsce.2024.451732.3388
8. Ferreira, F., Moutinho, C., Cunha, Á. and Caetano, E., 2018. Proposal of optimum tuning of semiactive TMDs used to reduce harmonic vibrations based on phase control strategy. Structural Control and Health Monitoring, 25(4), p.e2131. DOI: 10.1002/stc.2131
9. Yu, H., Sun, X., Xu, J. and Zheng, P., 2016. The time-delay coupling nonlinear effect in sky-hook control of vibration isolation systems using Magneto-Rheological Fluid dampers. Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology, 30, pp.4157-4166. DOI: 10.1007/s12206-016-0827-9
10. Liu, Y., Waters, T.P. and Brennan, M., 2005. A comparison of semi-active damping control strategies for vibration isolation of harmonic disturbances. Journal of sound and vibration, 280(1-2), pp.21-39. DOI: 10.1016/j.jsv.2003.11.048
11. Valášek, M., Novak, M., Šika, Z. and Vaculin, O., 1997. Extended ground-hook-new concept of semi-active control of truck's suspension. Vehicle system dynamics, 27(5-6), pp.289-303. DOI: 10.1080/00423119708969333
12. Zhang, Y., Schauer, T., Wernicke, L., Wulff, W. and Bleicher, A., 2020. Facade-integrated semi-active vibration control for wind-excited super-slender tall buildings. IFAC-PapersOnLine, 53(2), pp.8395-8400. DOI:10.1016/j.ifacol.2020.12.1585
13. Viet, L.D., Nghi, N.B., Hieu, N.N., Hung, D.T., Linh, N.N. and Hung, L.X., 2014. On a combination of ground-hook controllers for semi-active tuned mass dampers. Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology, 28, pp.2059-2064. DOI:10.1007/s12206-014-0109-3
14. Koo, J.H., Ahmadian, M., Setareh, M. and Murray, T., 2004. In search of suitable control methods for semi-active tuned vibration absorbers. Journal of Vibration and Control, 10(2), pp.163-174. DOI: 10.1177/1077546304032020
15. Kim, G.C. and Kang, J.W., 2011. Seismic response control of adjacent building by using hybrid control algorithm of MR damper. Procedia Engineering, 14, pp.1013-1020. DOI: 10.1016/j.proeng.2011.07.127
16. Kim, H.S. and Kang, J.W., 2012. Semi-active fuzzy control of a wind-excited tall building using multi-objective genetic algorithm. Engineering Structures, 41, pp.242-257. DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2012.03.038
17. Javadinasab, H.S., Salari, S. and Ghorbani-Tanha, A., 2014. Optimization of combination of sky-hook and ground-hook algorithms in semi-active control of steel frames. In Proc., 6th World Conf. on Structural Control and Monitoring. Barcelona, Spain: International Center for Numerical Methods in Engineering.
18. Rashidi, H., Khanlari, K., Zarfam, P. and Ghafory-Ashtiany, M., 2021. A novel approach of active control of structures based on the critically damped condition. Journal of Vibration and Control, 27(13-14), pp.1511-1523. DOI: 10.1177/1077546320944300
19. Yi, F., Dyke, S.J., Caicedo, J.M. and Carlson, J.D., 2001. Experimental verification of multiinput seismic control strategies for smart dampers. Journal of engineering Mechanics, 127(11), pp.1152-1164. DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2001)127:11(1152)
 
 
دوره 42، شماره 1 - شماره پیاپی 1
مقالات شماره بهار در حال بارگذاری می باشد
بهار 1405
صفحه 3-16