مروری بر آسیب‌ها و تجربیات حاصل از حوادث مهم در سدهای بتنی

نوع مقاله : مروری

نویسندگان

دانشکده‌ی مهندسی عمران و محیط‌زیست، دانشگاه تربیت مدرس، تهران، ایران.

چکیده

آسیب به سدهای بزرگ می‌تواند منجر به فاجعه شود. برخی از سدهای بتنی بدون شناخت کافی از شرایط پی و بارهای محیطی و با فرضیه‌های ناقص، طراحی و اجرا شده‌اند. همچنین ضعف کششی و برشی بتن بدنه‌ی سد می‌تواند باعث ترک‌های بزرگ ترد و ناگهانی شود؛ لذا ترکیب عوامل ذکرشده، تهدیدی جدی برای ایمنی سدهای بزرگ است. با وجود پیشرفت‌های علمی، احتمال خطا و عدم قطعیت در رفتار سازه‌های اخیر نفی نمی‌شود؛ لذا، مطالعه‌ی رخدادهای گذشته برای ارزیابی ریسک و مدیریت سدهای بزرگ حائز اهمیت است. با تحلیل سیستمی رفتار سدها، می‌توان شناخت بهتری از مجموعه‌ی سد- مخزن- پی به‌دست آورد و از وقوع حوادث مشابه جلوگیری کرد. در مطالعه‌ی حاضر، به بررسی آسیب‌های تاریخی واردشده به سدهای بزرگ بتنی و تحلیل عوامل مؤثر پرداخته شده و براساس آن می‌توان گفت اغلب حوادث در اثر ترکیب عوامل مختلف، به‌ویژه خطاهای انسانی در مراحل طراحی، اجرا یا بهره‌برداری، و به‌خصوص هنگام اولین آبگیری رخ‌ داده‌اند. 

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله [English]

A Review of Damages and Lessons Learnt from Major Incidents in Concrete Dams

نویسندگان [English]

  • Mohammad Taghi Ahmadi
  • Ehsan Valadkani
Faculty of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran.
چکیده [English]

Large dams are structures considered national assets, and any incident involving them can be catastrophic in terms of loss of life, property, and social impact. Most large concrete dams have been gradually constructed over the past century. Many of these dams were built without sufficient understanding of the foundation and abutment conditions, without a proper grasp of load processes and probable environmental conditions in their design, or with incorrect assumptions about the behavior of materials and structural systems. Given that the weakness of unreinforced concrete used in the main body of dams under tensile and shear conditions leads to sudden and brittle cracks of large dimensions, a combination of various incidents can create a concerning scenario, either gradually or abruptly, posing a serious threat to the safety of the dam and reservoir system. Even modern knowledge and technology cannot entirely rule out the possibility of errors or unintended uncertainties in the behavior of these strategic structures. As a result, risk management practices, including the study of past events and minor and major incidents, have become crucial in the evaluation and assessment of large dam systems. Through systematic or case studies on the behavior and service life processes of these systems, there is hope for a deeper understanding of the dam-reservoir-foundation system's behavior, thereby enabling the prevention of similar incidents in the future. The objective of this study is to investigate the most significant historical damages sustained by large concrete dams and analyze the factors contributing to each incident and its various dimensions. In most cases of dam failure, it is impossible to attribute the damage to a single factor. Typically, major damage or failure in a concrete dam results from a combination of factors that interact with one another or form a chain of events leading to the primary failure. Overall, based on past incidents and research, it becomes clear that although factors such as overall foundation weakness, unforeseen mechanisms resulting from geological or geotechnical deficiencies within the foundation and abutment, issues arising from complex thermal loads, seepage, and unforeseen earthquake characteristics are recognized as the most common causes of severe incidents, in most cases, it is human error—stemming from a lack of sufficient knowledge about the system, ignorance of available knowledge, or non-technical managerial decisions—that enables these physical factors to take effect. Such errors during the design, construction, and operation phases provide the opportunity for the above-mentioned physical factors to exert their influence. Finally, it should be noted that most major incidents occur during the early years of the dam’s life, particularly during the initial reservoir filling, underscoring the absolute necessity of a gradual, step-by-step approach and the strict enforcement of monitoring regulations during this critical period. 

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Concrete dam
  • dam failure
  • structural damage
  • damage factor
  • human error
  • uncertainty
1. Hariri-Ardebili, M.A., Salamon, J., Mazza, G., Tosun, H. and Xu, B., 2020. Advances in dam engineering. Infrastructures, 5(5), pp. 39. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/infrastructures5050039.
2. ICOLD Incident database bulletin 99 update statistical analysis of dam failures committee on dam safety. 2019. International Commission on Large Dams (ICOLD). Available at: https://www.icoldchile.cl/boletines/188.pdf.
3. Jansen, R.B., 1988. Advanced dam engineering for design, construction, and rehabilitation. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York.
4. Londe, P., 1987. The malpasset dam failure. Engineering Geology, 24(1-4), pp.295–329. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0013-7952(87)90069-x.
5. Conde, A., Toledo, M.Á. and Salete, E., 2024. Cracks in arch dams: an overview of documented instances. Applied Sciences, 14(17), pp.7580. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/app14177580 .
6. Amberg, F., Etaati, H. and Basereh, G., 2018. Assessment of karun IV abnormal behavior and estimated role of impervious clayey bed within the foundation. In Twenty-Sixth International Congress on Large Dams, pp.92–105. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1201/9780429465086-230 .
7. Lombardi, G., 1991. Kölnbrein dam: an unusual solution for an unusual problem. International Water Power & Dam Construction, 43(6), pp.31–34.
8. Soltani, N. and Ahmadi, M.T., 2015. Investigation of the causes of cracking and abnormal displacements in arch concrete dams. M.Sc. Thesis. Tarbiat Modares University. [In Persian].
9. Léger, P., 2023. Compendium on structural behavior, modeling, safety and rehabilitation of concrete dams. Polytechnique Montreal.
10. Lombardi, G., 2004. Case histories of concrete dams (structural cracks): structural safety assessment of dams. CISM International Centre for Mechanical Sciences, pp.21.
11. Bremen, R., Lombardi, G. and Amberg, F., 2001. Long term behaviour of three arch dams. In Sixth Benchmark Workshop on Numerical Analysis of Dams, organised by ICOLD, Salzburg.
12. Chopra, A.K., 2020. Earthquake engineering for concrete dams: analysis, design, and evaluation. John Wiley & Sons. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119056102.
13. Tosun, H., 2015. Earthquakes and dams. In Earthquake Engineering - From Engineering Seismology to Optimal Seismic Design of Engineering Structures. InTech. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/59372.
14. Wieland, M., 2020. Effect of reservoir-triggered seismicity on safety of large dam projects. INCOLD Journal, 9(2), pp.4–10.
15. Gupta, H.K., 2022. Artificial water reservoir-triggered seismicity (RTS): most prominent anthropogenic seismicity. Surveys in Geophysics, 43, 619–659 . DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10712-021-09675-z.
16. International Commission on Large Dams (ICOLD), 2011. Reservoirs and seismicity: state of knowledge. Bull. 137.
17. Sêco e Pinto, P.S., 2015. Lessons learned from dams behavior under earthquakes. Geotechnical, Geological and Earthquake Engineering, pp.187–246. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10786-8_9.
18. Wieland, M., 2021. Damage of sefid rud buttress dam project in iran caused by the magnitude 7.4 manjil earthquake of june 21, 1990. INCOLD Journal, 10(2), pp.4–14.
19. Arcangeli, E. and Ciabarri, P., 1994. Menjil dam rehabilitation by resin grouting and high capacity anchors. International Water Power & Dam Construction, 46(2), pp.19–25.
20. Ahmadi, M.T. and Khoshrang, G., 1992. Sefidrud dam’s dynamic response to the large near-field earthquake of june 1990. Dam Engineering, 3(2), pp.85–115.
21. Alves, S.W., 2005. Nonlinear analysis of pacoima dam with spatially nonuniform ground motion. PhD Thesis. California Institute of Technology.
22. Oliveira, S. and Mendes, P., 2008. Development of a cabril dam finite element model for dynamic analysis using ambient vibration tests results. Springer eBooks, pp.755. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-5370-3_755.
23. Henriques, M.J., Lima, J.N. and Oliveira, S., 2012. Measuring inclinations in cabril dam with an optoelectronic sensor. In FIG Working Week 2013, Roma.
24. Dungar, R., 1990. Observed and computer simulated movements in the 157 m high zervreila arch dam. In International Workshop on Arch Dams, pp.364–371.
25. Wang, W., Ding, J., Wang, G., Zou, L. and Chen, S., 2011. Stability analysis of the temperature cracks in xiaowan arch dam. Science China Technological Sciences, 54(3), pp.547–555. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11431-010-4280-1.